The dispute over Baby Boy, a dog, appeared relatively straightforward: the plaintiff asserted ownership, while the defendant claimed to have acquired the canine from the streets for a nominal fee of $50.
Expressing some doubt regarding the defendant’s presented evidence, which included a pile of photos and documents, Judge Judy appeared uncertain about the true owner of Baby Boy.
Employing an unconventional method, the renowned judge relied on the loyalty of man’s best friend to aid her decision. Requesting the defendant to bring the dog into the courtroom and allow it to roam freely, she observed the animal’s spontaneous affectionate display towards the genuine owner.
Without hesitation, the dog dashed toward the plaintiff, solidifying the truth of the case. Consequently, the judge ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting permission to take Baby Boy back home
